Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4pm (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:15, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- 4pm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A business whose main claim to fame is winning third place in a competition by the Regional Chamber of Commerce for Northern Primorska isn't what I would call notable by any stretch. Searching for sources is a bit tricky, but when I searched Google books, news, and scholar by putting "for project management" in quotes after the company name I found nothing of use. The references already provided don't establish notability. ~TPW 14:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:SPAM. - DonCalo (talk) 21:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as above, non-notable software, created by an SPA as likely spam/promotional. Dialectric (talk) 11:12, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I did additional searches on the parent company Arctur, with an eye towards maybe wrapping this into a larger article, but found no relevant hits on news, books, or scholar. If there are sources they aren't available at my local library, so someone else would have to dig them up.--~TPW 20:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.